Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning Tri-X

2004-01-09 by Daniel Staver

> For 35mm, if you like Tri-X, try Neopan 1600 developed in 
> XTOL, 1:1 or even 1:3.  It's got very smooth tonality, and 
> really quite reduced grain for that speed.  I use Delta 3200 
> rated at 1600 for MF, same developer.

It's funny you should recommend that now, since I've just gone through
ten rolls of Neopan 1600 after reading about it on the Photo.net forums.
I develop it in DD-X 1:4 and rate it at 640-1200. I think it's a little
contrasty at 1600. 

The flowers on my homepage were shot handheld in the middle of the
night, with only a streetlight for lightning, and rated at 1600:
http://daniel.staver.no/content/view/full/2/offset/6/

This one is rated at 640:
http://daniel.staver.no/content/view/full/2/offset/0/

It's the finest grained high speed film I've tried, better than many 400
iso films even.

I still like Tri-X a lot though...

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.