> The 7600/9600 is suddenly back on the radar also. UT2 now has a significant > advantage over IP5 and UC systems for B&W printers. Paul: you may recall that I posted a question last week about UT-2 and wide-format printers. By your answer here, I take it that you think it might be worthwhile to develop UT-2 cartridges and curves to use with these printers? I guess, not knowing anything about the UT or UT-2 inksets, I don't understand why these printers were "off the radar" originally for UT-2, and what has changed so that they're now back "on the radar"? I also assume that the advantage you refer to that UT-2 would have over the UC inks (with or without IP) is that your testing now reveals that switching black inks isn't necessary? Are there other advantages that I'm missing? In short: do you envision that, in the near future, the UT-2 inkset and workflow will be available to use with the 7600/9600 and not require black ink switching? If so, I'll be among the earliest of early adopters. I've been waiting to get a wide-format to see exactly how Epson's whole R800/4000/current product line mess shakes out. However, sicne I'm now thinking of dedicating a wide-format printer to B&W, I have less need to wait if there's a good B&W inkset approach for the 9600/7600 (well, Septone seems like a good approach, but I'd like to avoid the cost and complication of their RIP if possible)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Glossy printing with Eboni -- who needs a 4000?
2004-01-19 by chipcarterdc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.