--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Shaun Granleese" <shaun@s...> wrote: > Julian - this assessment is based on evaluation by myself and my wife > (she's a big time PiezoBW user and fan) under incandescent light of > the same image printed on one half (top or bottom) of the same piece > of EAM by two different Epson 1160's (one dedicated to each ink > obviously). > > Conclusion: practically indistinguishable in tone and colour, > sharpness, contrast, smoothness or any other variable we could think > of to concentrate on. We both preferred the MIS FS actually. > Confounding factors: incandescent light was used, it was midnight, > I'm not the guru some of you are, I'd love to pay less for my ink and > might be biased :-) > > Bottom line = I was very impressed. Julian, I have some of Bernd's prints covering the same range of ink and driver options and I agree with all Shaun has to say above. I will add that the MIS FS are not going to print exactly like the Piezo inks. The process may involve some different adjustment to your files prior to printing. The final results may not be absolutely identical but what they show is that all three options are fully viable ways to make a top quality inkjet print. Martin Wesley (snip)> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" > <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > > Shaun, as someone who has just seen the difference between piezo > and FIS can > > you describe the two. I don't like the 'blueness' I've ssen of MIS - > how > > would you describe FIS? > >
Message
MIS FS, Piezo Quality was [Digital BW] Re: Print Exchange 4 Bernd et al.
2001-10-12 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.