Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

MIS FS, Piezo Quality was [Digital BW] Re: Print Exchange 4 Bernd et al.

2001-10-12 by Martin Wesley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Shaun Granleese" 
<shaun@s...> wrote:
> Julian - this assessment is based on evaluation by myself and my 
wife 
> (she's a big time PiezoBW user and fan) under incandescent light of 
> the same image printed on one half (top or bottom) of the same 
piece 
> of EAM by two different Epson 1160's (one dedicated to each ink 
> obviously). 
> 
> Conclusion: practically indistinguishable in tone and colour, 
> sharpness, contrast, smoothness or any other variable we could 
think 
> of to concentrate on. We both preferred the MIS FS actually. 
> Confounding factors: incandescent light was used, it was midnight, 
> I'm not the guru some of you are, I'd love to pay less for my ink 
and 
> might be biased :-)
> 
> Bottom line = I was very impressed.

Julian,

I have some of Bernd's prints covering the same range of ink and 
driver options and I agree with all Shaun has to say above. I will 
add that the MIS FS are not going to print exactly like the Piezo 
inks. The process may involve some different adjustment to your files 
prior to printing. The final results may not be absolutely identical 
but what they show is that all three options are fully viable ways to 
make a top quality inkjet print.

Martin Wesley

(snip)> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" 
> <julianthomas@t...> wrote:
> > Shaun, as someone who has just seen the difference between piezo 
> and FIS can
> > you describe the two. I don't like the 'blueness' I've ssen of 
MIS -
>  how
> > would you describe FIS?
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.