Personally, I scan in 16bit grayscale, and print in 16bit grayscale. When you scan a B&W negative in RGB, you pickup the color of the base, whatever stains there are, etc. But is this information, or just more data? My experiments convinced me that the extra data is meaningless. Of course, YMMV, and plenty of people will argue the opposite. On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 07:29, Cat wrote: > I would like to know your opinoins about scanning b&w negatives: is > there any difference (except file dimension!) between scanning them > in colour, using mixer channel and then print, and scanning in b&w > mode, convert to rgb and then print? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negatives
2004-01-22 by hogarth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.