Dennis, a green filter will emphasize "pimples and blotches". Those skin defects tend to be reddish and a green filter will make then darker. Green filters in portraiture are usually used for men in direct sunlight. I gives then a more sun tanned swarthy look. To smooth out women's skin one would usually use a yellow filter. Remember complementary colors are used to darken. Yellow #15 filter/blue sky ect... --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis W. Manasco" <dmanasco@i...> wrote: > At 8:18 am -0500 1/24/04, Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > The reason I make this assertion is that it used to be so common as > >> to be almost standard to use a green filter when doing B&W > >> portraiture. (I'm sorry, but I do not remember the filter number; it > >> was one of the standard Kodak filters.) > > > >I believe that the reason the green channel is given the highest weight when > >converting from color to B&W is it simply carries the most information > >(middle of the spectrum), and it is the cleanest channel (the least bloom > >and smear of a CCD sensor). I don't believe the reasons for using it are > >not related at all to using a green filter for B&W portraiture (which I, > >personally, never heard of...but I never did any B&W portraiture ;- ). > > > Austin -- > > You _may_ be right about why it was chosen for converting scans. But > as for using a green filter for B&W portraiture you might look at: > > <http://www.schneideroptics.com/filters/filters_for_still_photography/ black_&_white/> > > and scroll down to the B+W 061 green [13] filter. > > Apparently Schneider still makes this filter and I am certain several > others do as well, though I believe Kodak has sold their filter line > to someone else. > > Schneider's description of using the 061/Kodak 13 for portraiture > is...umm...diplomatic. It was used for pimple and blotchiness > reduction. (The reason that they state "with high-speed film" is the > filter factor: 3.0.) > > By the way: The part of the description about using it for enhancing > subtle differences in green tones when shooting black and white is > dead on. High-summer forest and meadow scenes shot on Pan-X (a sorely > missed old friend) or better through a K13 and properly printed will > take your breath away -- the eye and the brain don't begin to notice > as many tonal variations in grass and canopy as you can get this way. > > > Best wishes, > > -=-Dennis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negatives
2004-01-25 by islandbuck2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.