I let the image dictate the print size. I try as best possible to frame the image so I don't have to crop. Not every image is suited to an 8x10 or 11x14 or an 8 x12 format and the image can be distracting if you try to force a format that's not right for the image. Some images are better suited to a 6x12, a 7x13 or even a 10x10. I do frame it so that I only need to crop in one dimension since the more you crop the poorer the final print - got that from my wet darkroom days and 35mm. Truman Mark Hahn wrote: > As I said, it's a personal choice, so I'm not arguing one way or the > other, but for me, even with cropping I almost always stay with the > format that I shoot in. That is because I frame to that format and > plan on using the full frame. The only exception is 6x6, mainly > because I don't think in square. When I was young and inexperienced > I used to crop a lot and would crop to any aspect ratio that "fixed" > my poorly framed shots... but now I am much more careful what I > shoot, maybe because I've dealt with a lot of low rez digitals, scans > and tiny film formats like Minox so I got in the habit of having to > make every bit of my frame count and just work with each format. > Just a different approach... not that I am "full-frame or nothing" > nazi, but I just find that it it's how I work best with most images. > > The real bummer is that no one is offering paper in "legal size;" > which would be perfect for a 8x12" print on my hp 7660. > > mark > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Print sizes
2004-02-12 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.