Just one end of the spectrum of responses I expect you will get. I have kind of gone down the road you are exploring. Found digital cameras great for certain things but not for fine arts photography (?yet). Settled on the 3/4 gig file from (my) drum scanner from 4X5 and 1 3/4 gig file from 11 X 14. Just no substitute for the look and ³feel² of the work from this source, no matter what I do in Photoshop. This is true even with a print as small as 11 X 14, of course even more so with a 48 X 65 mural print. On 2/12/04 1:26 PM, "randyrancier" <randyrancier@...> wrote: > I used to be primarily a large format photographer 4x5 & 5x7, as > well as doing a fair amount of 35mm B&W. I worked in silver and > palladium print making. I am fairly new to digital photography and > up to this point have only worked with digital images from my 3 > megapixel camera; I've really enjoyed it, and it has gotten me back > into photography. The digital darkroom is much more convienient > than a wet darkroom, hallelujah! > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Negative Size ?
2004-02-13 by J Vee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.