>>..... - Note that the HP Premium Plus paper (I use the Matte >surface, which is >> actually a semigloss/luster) tends to buckle lot especially in >heavy ink >> coverage areas. The Ilford Galerie Classic paper, on the other hand >(I just >> tried the Pearl surface), dries absolutely flat, and BTW provides >slightly >> more open shadows and even less gloss differential than the HP >paper. >> >> -- Nick >> >> NICHOLAS HARTMANN > > >Hi Nick, >I have also just started using Ilford Gallerie Classic Pearl on my HP >7660. I prefer the look of it to the HP paper. Pity about the >longevity as it would be nice to use that paper for exhibition prints >as it has the look of gelatin silver(even though it's a RC paper), >especially under glass. > >I am wondering if you can tell me what driver settings you are using >as I an experimenting somewhat to see what gives the best result. So >far I have found thst using "HP Premium Plus Photo Paper Matte" as >the paper type, and printing at max dpi gives me a very nice print. >It's always interesting to hear what users are doing. As best I can remember (the printer is hooked up to the computer at home, where I am not at the moment): I use the "HP Premium Plus Photo Paper Glossy" for both the Glossy and "Matte" (= luster) surfaces, and the same for the Ilford Galerie Classic Pearl. I have decided the results are good enough that I will NOT drive myself crazy trying every available paper profile, but if your psyche is more robust you might find one that's just perfect. I have found that reducing the ink density just one notch (the control is in the "Paper Type" section when you hit Print), I get less cockling with the HP paper and more open, readable shadows with either paper. YMMV. -- Nick NICHOLAS HARTMANN Technical and scientific translator (414) 271-4890 nh@... http://www.nhartmann.com
Message
Re: HP 7660/7960 opinions?
2004-02-18 by Nicholas Hartmann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.