Thanks for your replies. (fwiw, I have a 1280 and winXP) > Roy has done some very interesting work on the soft proofing issue, as noted > in the post, below. Roy : Thanks for the response. When are you porting the RIP to Windows, so i can use it? :) I assume the profiles generated by that system aren't be portable over to my winXP/1280 setup, are they? Paul : > To be honest, I just match the grayscale image on the monitor to the print. I wonder if this will be easier to do for greyscale than color. I have some experience with the ColorVision callibration suite and always have a bit of frustration when it comes to eyeballing comparisons between print/monitor. Because of this, I feel paranoid about going with the less accurate (or just more reliant on me) way of doing things. :) > To match the monitor's grayscale image to the print, I use a Photoshop > custom dot gain curve. That procedure is explained on my information web > page, the second URL below. Thanks for the information and developing the resource. I guess I can just give it a go and see how I can match the results. I am assuming eliminating test prints is perhaps an unreasonable goal, but I guess it's just up to me to see how "good" I am at my comparisons and image editing. The MIS vs. Piezo price difference is very appealing, but not if I, as a novice digital printamaker can't get what I subjectively think are accurate prints easily. Ok, maybe that's unreasonable again. :) To give some context, I am a working photog that would like to produce some archival, fine art b&w prints. Thanks, -Kev
Message
Re: 2000p or 1280, piezo or mis? Break it down...
2004-02-25 by Kevin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.