If you buy imageprint you would not need the 1280 and even though it seems expensive, if you factor in the hassle of running two printers etc. etc. it ends up being a bargain (ok, mis inks are dirt cheap, but still CFS etc. are a pain compared to using off the shelf epson inks). mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Dempsey" <jdempsey@c...> wrote: > This post has convinced me to buy an Epcon 1280. It seems this is the most > popular and widely used printer for BW output. I have a 2200, but need the > capability for color output for the advertising side of my business. From > what I've read, BW output for the 2200 is still a work-in-progress and yet > to yield universal satisfactory results in BW output, versus the 1280 which > has a ton of users and a solid track record. Am I on the right track? > Thanks! > Joe
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A photographer's thoughts on digital black & white printing:
2004-02-26 by Mark Hahn