No 5400 tested with ISO 160067 methods as far as I know. But I may have missed a test in Color Foto or C't. The test method is however just defined and not yet published so one can not expect much test results yet. See http://www.image-engineering.de/de/ for the test methods and http://www.heise.de/ct/ http://www.colorfoto.de/d/1480 for any tests in the issues that I've missed. Oh, wait a minute: I found something however with google: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005CLy looks like they tested in Color Foto with similar methods more than a year ago, the tester Dietmar Wueller takes part in creating this new ISO method. I see that I have also missed the january 2004 issue with much more tests. Ernst quote: Christian Suwato , dec 16, 2003; 09:52 p.m. For the friends of scanner tests here some pieces of information: Scanner test in Color Foto, January 2004: ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Microtek 120 tf: iso dynamic range: 3,67 (colour)/2,87 (b+w) iso scanner Dmax: 3,75 signal/noise at D= 2,85: 5,14 S/Nx resolution slow scan (= direction of movement): 2880 ppi resolution fast scan (= along scan row): 3400 ppi colour reproduction: 6.80 Delta E uniformity of illumination: 97,48% depth of field: 0,78 mm deviation from the scale of the picture: fast scan/slow scan: 0,00%/0,00% pixel shift: 1,49 pixel The Microtek Scan Wizard likes to crash if preview is left out before scanning in high resolution Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400: 3,22/2,80 4,23 4,22 S/Nx 4000/5000 ppi 8,47 Delta E 97,79% 0,39 mm 0,00/0,31% ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Scanner test in Color Foto, February 2002: [93 points:] Polaroid Sprintscan 120: Dmax: 3,9 ca. 4000 ppi [92/90 points:] Nikon Coolscan 8000 ED: Dmax >3,6 (colour)/2,3 (b+w) ca. 4000 ppi [84 points:]Minolta Dimage Scan Multi: Dmax 2,9 ca. almost 4000 ppi (35mm), 3200 ppi [84 points:]Microtek ArtixcScan 4500: Dmax 3,3 ? ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Conclusion in Foto Magazin, January 2004: 74 points = very good: Microtek ArtixScan 120tf 70 points = good: Microtek ArtixScan 4500t 89 points = good: Nikon Super Coolscan 9000 ED 68,5 points = good: Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Nikon Coolscan 5000/V vs b&w films
2004-03-09 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.