Hello Karo, >What is today's VERY, VERY BEST technology for digital black >and white printing? You will probably get several different answers to this. Imagine asking a bunch of zonies what is the best paper... There are several excellent systems available, and all are being used to make beautiful prints by people who have paid their dues, worked hard, and learned. It's not easy to decide which system to invest in. One thing to beware of is the trap of thinking that the printer/ink system is the only element in the mix that results in a good print. The other side of the coin is the user's skills in the software used to prepare the image (usually Photoshop). That's a whole 'nother ballgame with a big learning curve all its own. You can be a super photographer and buy the best system and if you don't know your way around the software you will produce poor results. You say that "excellent is not good enough". That's a pretty loaded statement, sort of like stacking the deck in advance. I don't know what you have looked at so far, but if you are satisfied that what you have seen is the best that can be done and it's not good enough, then maybe digital printing is not for you. On the other hand you might make an effort to view some prints from a true master printer like Paul Roark, Roy Harrington, Tyler Boley and others, and be sure you really have seen what can be done before making up your mind. Many (if not most) of the photographers who frequent this forum have many years of dedicated darkroom experience, and have left it behind and aren't looking back. So you can conclude that either they have all lost their senses and are opting out for poor quality so they can play with their new high-tech toys, or maybe, just maybe, there is some good reason for it. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: Digital output to match fiber based printing?
2004-03-13 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.