George, >Would I use the "plain paper" setting for all papers? >I use primarily EEM. On the C84 I probably would use the "Plain Paper" setting for all matte papers. Here are the notes regarding the C84 I sent to MIS: My testing of the C84 indicates it prints at a higher contrast than the C82. The contrast slider can bring the shadows in line, but with matte papers the highlights stay lighter than my targets. With a "Contrast -15" setting, however, a print on Epson Enhanced Matte closely matches some of the LCD monitors that are used by most of the people in my house, although the highlights are brighter than on my CRT. So, Epson may have set up the C84 with the assumption most users today would have the affordable LCDs that my family members prefer. Interestingly, with the Plain Paper setting the C84 does not under-print the black ink with color inks. As such, it has as good a dmax as the more expensive Epson printers. So, with the C84 and matte papers I recommend using the following settings: Best Photo, Color Controls, and "Plain Paper." I would set the Contrast slider back to -15 or until the amount of detail in the print shadows matches the monitor being used. Moving the Brightness slider to -5 also helps, although on EEM deep shadow contrast is a bit low. For archival paper, especially since the dmax is fine with the "Plain Paper" setting on the C84, I recommend Epson Scrapbook paper (also known at Epson UltraSmooth or PremierArt Fine Art Hot Press). It prints very well with the above settings. With Epson Glossy Photo Paper, the C84 does a very good job with the "Glossy Photo Paper" and "Best Photo" settings. The print shadow detail can be helped if the Contrast slider is set back to -10, or until the print shadow detail matches the monitor being used. It continues to amaze me that this little printer with the EZ B&W inks can match the quality of systems that people pay over $1000 for. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT EZ B&W on C84 (Paul?)
2004-03-22 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.