John, >... What papers would you suggest for archival printing? >I use an Epson 2200 with Image Print and a PC. >I have use both EEM and Luster, but if they are not archival, >maybe I should use something else. I use EEM for display and non-archival uses. It's a great paper and value for many purposes. However, the risk is, even with snapshots, for example, that I make one not thinking about archival uses, but it turns out to be the best image of an important person down the road years from now. So, how to balance longevity with other important criteria can be tough. But I increasingly use cotton-based matte papers even for snapshots. There are a number of cotton-based inkjet papers. PhotoRag is probably the most popular, in part because it has the best dmax of any of the current papers. (Permajet Alpha will likely match it when released.) However, PhotoRag has a sensitive surface. It and most cotton-based papers have problems with flaking (small bits of coating coming off) that is a nuisance to deal with, but can be largely eliminated by brushing or wiping the surface off before printing. The surface is also very easy to damage by abrasion and is sensitive to some chemicals. I am occasionally invited to give talks to groups about archival printing and old photo restoration. To these groups, I recommend Epson Scrapbook paper (also sold by PremierArt as Fine Art Hot Press and by Epson in rolls as UltraSmooth). It is a cotton-based paper with a surface that does not flake significantly. It also has no optical brighteners in it. These make a paper look whiter, but they burn out and make the paper look relatively yellow after being exposed to light for long periods. The byproducts of the brighteners breaking down are very reactive and were apparently the cause of some of the original RC paper problems. Whether they will cause trouble in long term storage or display of inkjet prints is unknown, but I favor papers with no optical brighteners for long term display or storage. (Actually, with the 2200 and UT7 [perhaps with LC in the LM spot], Arches Hot Press 90 may be the ultimate matte paper for longevity. However, I don't know how it prints with Image Print, and I doubt most will want to deal with an uncoated paper. It's in fade testing now.) For glossy paper, Premium Luster very likely is archival. The entire Epson Premium line of papers (Semigloss, Gloss, Luster, & Semimatte) are the only glossy papers that I've tested that have a buffered paper interior and print well with pigments. Wilhelm rates them at ">200 years" of dark storage. This is the same rating he gives the best cotton papers. However, so many of us photographers got burned by RC photo papers in the past that I think there will be a lot of distrust of this type of paper in terms of it's long term stability. Hope this helps. Paul www.PaulRoark.com For UT2 information, curves, and settings see: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Glossy Paper Heavy Weight
2004-03-24 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.