--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mitch Alland <malland@x> wrote: snip.. > For B&W prints, I also found more brilliance from the Photo > Black/Semi-Matte than from Matte Black and matte paper, bearing out > Anselm Adams observation above. But the trouble is that prints on > Semi-Matte have some bronzing, although, paradoxically, I find the > bronzing less objectionable on large (16x24") than small (A4) prints. > Some people have suggested that Epson Pro Glossy paper has less > bronzing, but for me the problem is that the largest roll that this > paper is available in is 17", not 24". I have also heard that Oriental > FB Glossy paper is less subject to bronzing than Semi-Matte but, apart > from its cost, Paul Roark reports that this paper has substantially > lower Dmax than EEM, and has a very fragile surface too boot. So for > B&W, the bronzing problem remains, although it can be solved by > laminating the print or by face-mounting on plexiglass which I have > found is the most spectacular way to display a large print -- and > that's as close to the holy grail that I can get. I was able to completely eliminate bronzing on Ilford Smooth Pearl, printed on a 2200 with the MIS UT inks, with a single thin coating of Renaissance wax. Quick and easy to apply (at least for prints up to 12x18 inches) and it leaves a very smooth, beautiful surface. The wax does not seem to work as well on smoother RC surfaces, so I don't know if it would perform as well on semimatte. Carl
Message
Re: Matte vs Glossy Paper and the Holy Grail
2004-04-02 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.