Bernd, I think that we best go with the Hahnemuhle spelling at this point since we have already gone down that road. A test search on the list using "Hahnemuhle" turns up about a page of posts while "Hahnemühle" and "Hahnemuehle" give no results. I would complain to Yahoo except they don't seem to have a adress to complain to. The entire thing is ridiculuous since they have Yahoo home pages in several European countries that appear to use these characters without a problem. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., ruhrfoto@y... wrote: (snip earlier) > Martin, > it is a crux with the German "Umlaute" ä, ö, ü. > Unfortunately the ü occurs in the Hahnemühle brand, so many Headers > in this and other lists are corrupted. > In Germany we would avoid the problem by changing the > > ä to ae > ö to oe > ü to ue > > But the American list members seem to prefer to skip the e. > So there are two possible variations to avoid the "Umlaut"-problem in > spelling Hahnemühle (ore others) in headers: > 1. Hahnemuhle (American) > 2. Hahnemuehle (German). > > To keep the archives searchable, which one shall we use??? > > Bernd
Message
Re: Spelling Hahnemuehle,was: Subject and Header Lines
2001-08-06 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.