Yeah...I have an opinion on this very subject....
I think the coating idea is a good one for certain effect and certain needs.
However, I believe (and it is a gut feeling) that it would be better to put most Piezo prints behind UV blocking glass. I checked tonight and the manufacturer of my glass states 97% UV rays blocked. I bet that is better than a typical home sprayed on misting of a polymer that has "some" UV agents in it.
In addition, the glass "encapsulates" the image and protects it from a variety of other detrimental factors....sharp objects, poking fingers, kids with crayons, spaghetti sauce (you never know where those prints go), hairspray and perfume (again you never know)..etc...
I also think the matte surface of black carbon inks on matte cotton paper is sensual...meaning that you can "feel" surfaces with your eyes...so that skin looks like skin etc...
Finally, by not putting anything on the paper but the carbon ink, I have no fear of "coatings" turning yellow, cracking etc...
Nonetheless, I am still interested in the Morrison Mix (another plug) so that I can have alternative coatings available for alternative presentations.
Steadman
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Morrison
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating
Just did a quick experiment with several coated prints. Put the coated and
non-coated prints behind glass (I'm afraid it was cheap glass) separated
with a 8 ply Matte. I can tell instantly which print was coated and which
was noncoated. The difference is less striking that without the glass.
Wow...I hate glass...it really ruins the appearance of the prints...coated
and noncoated. I'm so used to cradling the babies in my hands...that it
seems wrong to hide their true beauty behind the glass. The problem is that
although I'd love to show my work without it...I'm not sure I can tell a
collector not to use it....hmmm...we probably need to do a fade on the
relative merits of glass vs. coatings.
If you were able to get equivalent fade from a non-coated print behind glass
and a coated print with no glass...would you coat and not use glass...or
would you want to improve the lightfastness by coating and using glass?
Any opinions?
Robert
On 10/15/01 11:03 AM, "Robert G. Morrison" <rmorrison@...> wrote:
> Let me get back to you on that one. I looked at this early on...and the
> coated prints still looked better...but that was many
> formulations/papers/application methods ago. I want to do some double blind
> evaluation.
>
> Robert
>
> On 10/15/01 10:29 AM, "Todd Flashner" <tflash@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>> One of my objectives in the coating project was to achieve the positives of
>>> glass without the negatives. Antonis and I have talked about this one at
>>> length. But the velvety surface of a coated print is definitely no
>>> more...but honestly I have trouble looking at an uncoated print next to a
>>> coated one because the coated print is so rich and deep.
>>
>> How do you feel about coating prints that *are* destined to be hung behind
>> glass? Is it still a worthwhile venture, or does the added dmax go unnoticed
>> because of the added dmax from the glass, and is the added dmax further
>> mitigated by yet another glare causing surface? IOW, I understand the
>> benefits of coating a print for display as opposed to using glass, but if
>> glass is a given, would you personally still coat the print?
>>
>> Todd
>>
>>
>>
>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
>> other
>> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>
>> Please follow these basic guidelines:
>> - Include your full name with your message.
>> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
>> them short.
>> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
>> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
>> resources on the homepage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------
> Robert Morrison
> rmorrison@...
>
> 310-397-2704
>
> 4131 Bledsoe Ave.
> Los Angeles, CA 90066
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
----------------------
Robert Morrison
rmorrison@...
310-397-2704
4131 Bledsoe Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90066
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating
2001-10-16 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.