> It's really the kind of thing that you can't know if you'll like it until > you see it, and it really varies by paper, as you well know. Absolutely. I love that velvety surface too...its one of things that really unique about Piezo...I just wish I could have it with the Dmax and luminosity increases I get with coating...but it definitely is a matter of personal taste. The problem is that the velvety surface is history once you put it behind glass or plastic. > If hung without glass, would you coat the mat board as well? Dust could be a > nuisance; how would you dust the surface of the print and mat board? > Antonis and I have talked about this one a lot. Seems like you would have to coat the mat board too...particularly if its not the good stuff. With the roller this shouldn't take too long for a show...maybe a couple of hours at most. Dust the prints with a soft rag...in fact you could even use a damp rag...no problem once the print is coated. All your flaking woes are over because the print and the pigment are "glued" to the paper. The main point to my question was: If coating and glazing gave equivalent protection would you... 1) take the benefit of seeing the print bare and skip the glass Or 2) want to "double" the lightfastness by coating and glazing Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating
2001-10-16 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.