Good Morning Steadman, While all of the color prints we sell are coated, it is not for U.V. protection. When we started doing/having this done years ago, the manufacturer claimed U V protection. Years later they retracted or at least did not make those claims any more. I recommend people not use glass on most of the color portraits we sell. Of course we tell people that we guarantee our prints.........had to replace one because of a child poking a ball point pen on it, so glass has it's place. Now B&W silver prints are a different story if extensive retouching has been done. On inkjet prints, I definitely feel they need protection of some sort, I agree with you that glass is probably the best. As you recall, I have had very, very bad things happen with prints other than color that have been sprayed. Regards, John in Okc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating : Yeah...I have an opinion on this very subject.... : : I think the coating idea is a good one for certain effect and certain needs. : : However, I believe (and it is a gut feeling) that it would be better to put most Piezo prints behind UV blocking glass. I checked tonight and the manufacturer of my glass states 97% UV rays blocked. I bet that is better than a typical home sprayed on misting of a polymer that has "some" UV agents in it. : <big snip>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating
2001-10-16 by JackG
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.