Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote: >I really suggest you read through the archives, the various B&W options >have been listed and discussed ad nauseum. It really would be redundant >and take up a lot of bandwidth, not to mention the time of those who >have listed all these options hitherto, right now to simply list all the >options here simply because people are too lazy to take the time to read >the archives.. Searching the archives in a Yahoo Group is incredibly inconvenient. This group has 44,000+ posts right now. The archives search function searches ~200 messages at a time. So you have to click "Next" 200 times to search all the archives. And, when you start reading the messages, Yahoo throws advertisements in your way. Not banner ads, but ads you have to click past. Then when you hit the back button after reading a particular message, to go back to the list of messages, you have to click through the same ad again. It's horrible. This is a great list, but Yahoo Groups is not a great place for it. I speak from experience as an owner of a former Yahoo Group. For archived information to be of any value on a Yahoo Group, someone has to take the time and trouble to maintain a good FAQ, and good key posts have to get featured on the "Links" page. Otherwise, the archives are all but useless. -Don M
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A printer for B&W: options?
2004-04-24 by Don M
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.