--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote: snip... Roy, I think your approach using LAB is as sound as any other if not more. I suspect many of the workflows used are based on a subjective decision about what looks good, at least you are conforming to something, and it also tends to look good. > Tyler, since you've picked the dot gain 20% for your linearized system. > I'm wondering how that compares with linear Lab. For instance, on > one step wedge I have: 0 step = 97 L, 50 step = 57 L, 100 step =17 L. > So the 50 step is right in the middle. What would your system give? Give me a few days, I'm just changing inks around and relinearizing. Since new ink is in, old linearizations won't be as relevant for this. > The trouble with all this is that no matter what you have that's what > your files are edited to so. It's painful to switch even if you think its > the right thing to do. I don't know how you can handle other > peoples files. I still think a color managed approach would help a great deal here. It does work for color for the most part and I've used it for B&W. If a file comes in tagged I can usually deal with it well, I've even recieved RGB and CMYK files. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Linearization - mathematical or perceptual?
2004-04-27 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.