Hi Roy, Thanks for that. Just so I know I've got the right end of the stick here, when you talk about "the other inkset" you mean the Bowhaus Config UT7 set, right? It's confusing looking at the MIS website, because they talk about both inksets on an equal footing, it's not clear that either one of them is a recent development. Looking at the traffic here, it seems as if UT7 (in any form) is a new thing. Assuming I've understood that correctly, if I wanted to try QTR with Paul's UT7 inkset, then it would "just" =) be a matter of generating a suitable profile for your RIP. Given what I've just been reading in the thread on linearisation, it should be possible for me to get a pretty good result there if I have access to a densitometer, at least if I don't try to bring the toner inks into the equation. I'm just hedging here, really. If I'm going to spend out on a load of ink, it would be nice to know I had the option to revert to QTR if it turns out I don't like what the Epson driver produces. Cheers, -= mike =- --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mike_nunan" > <mike_nunan@h...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've got a query for Roy and/or Paul, regarding the differences > > between the two variants of the UT7 inkset listed on MIS's website. > > These are described as the "Bowhaus Configuration", sold for use with > > QTR and IJC, and "Roark Configuration", sold for use with the Epson > > driver and Paul's curves. I'm intrigued that there are two inksets > > that are nearly, but not quite, the same. I know that one of Paul's > > goals was to create an "Easy B&W" inkset, and presumably that meant > > that the ink tones have to be made to fit in with the Epson driver's > > expectations. Is that what created the need for two separate sets? > > Roy, how hard would it be to use QTR with the "Roark Config" inks? > > > > TIA > > > > -= mike =- > > Having two ink sets for the same basic idea is complicated. > > Although I know the general idea of the new UT7 inks, I haven't > used or even seen them yet. Certainly the major reason for this > new set is to be able to use the ordinary Epson driver and get some > variable tone control. The seventh ink, light black, turns out to > make the Epson driver and its profiles quite complicated. I think that > this in turn makes the ink set fairly Epson driver oriented. > Whether this is a problem or not I don't know, but it may make the > QTR profiles a little more difficult trying to mimic the Epson driver. > > The other inkset is probably a simpler set if you are using QTR, > but of course then you must use it -- there's no Easy B&W workflow. > > Roy
Message
Re: UT7 inkset differences for QTR vs. Paul's workflow
2004-04-27 by mike_nunan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.