Hi Roy, It looks like there is some genuine confusion going on here with the terminology. Have a look at this page on the MIS website, about halfway down where under the UT7 heading: http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/bwpage.html As you can see, it clearly groups the Bowhaus config under UT7, whereas judging by your message below and many of the discussions in this group, it seems that most people regard UT7 as being Paul's inkset only. Maybe it's worth asking MIS to amend the page? Thanks for the detail on the use of Paul's UT7 mix with QTR. As I said, I'm really just hedging. Probably the smartest move for me right now would be to purchase a set of UT7 cartridges and if I'm not happy then I can try your inkset in another set of cartridges before committing myself to a CFS system, which would be the eventual idea. Cheers, -= mike =- --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Yes, there are two configurations. > > The latest and most talked about is UT7 or also called the Roark > configuration -- this will work with the Epson driver. > > The older one is under UT and also called Bowhaus or QuadToneRIP > configuration -- this requires one of the rips. > > What you are asking about doing -- trying UT7 with Epson first > and then possibly moving to QTR is certainly possible. The catch > is the "just make a profile". To do that you have to look at the individual > inks for both color and density and come up with a plan of how they > might fit together to make a neutral tone throughout. The plan is > a lot easier if you have all similar color grays and separate toners > to give the color. With the different densities having different colors > its just a lot more difficult. > > That said, most likely I'll end up making some UT7 profiles some > time. > > Roy > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mike_nunan" > <mike_nunan@h...> wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Thanks for that. Just so I know I've got the right end of the stick > > here, when you talk about "the other inkset" you mean the Bowhaus > > Config UT7 set, right? It's confusing looking at the MIS website, > > because they talk about both inksets on an equal footing, it's not > > clear that either one of them is a recent development. Looking at the > > traffic here, it seems as if UT7 (in any form) is a new thing. > > <snip>
Message
Re: UT7 inkset differences for QTR vs. Paul's workflow
2004-04-28 by mike_nunan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.