> As you can see, it clearly groups the Bowhaus config under UT7, > whereas judging by your message below and many of the discussions in > this group, it seems that most people regard UT7 as being Paul's > inkset only. Maybe it's worth asking MIS to amend the page? It seems they've renamed their inksets so that both configurations for the 2200 are now called UT7. The Bowhaus configuration used to be called just UT while the Roark configuration was announced as UT7, which is why most people here think of that as being Paul's inkset only. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: UT7 inkset differences for QTR vs. Paul's workflow
2004-04-28 by Daniel Staver