> I thought UT was the predecessor to UT2, and therefore was a 6-ink > set that's older than either the Bowhaus inkset for the 2200 or > Paul's UT7 inkset. MIS still list it as an option for the 1280: I know, it's just plain confusing... However, the only important thing you need to know is that the Roark configuration of the UT7 inkset is the latest and greatest, and should be the one to get once it's available. It should give you the same advantages as the Bowhaus configuration in a QTR setup, but will also work with the standard Epson drivers and curves, or even without any curves at all. I'm planning to ditch my UT1 setup and use UT7 when it's available as well. I have some images that would look nice in sepia, and I will also enjoy doing some glossy printing again. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: UT7 inkset differences for QTR vs. Paul's workflow
2004-04-28 by Daniel Staver