on 10/17/01 3:11 PM, Martin Wesley wrote: > I am very puzzled as to what your reasons are to question Paul's > motivation and integrity. He has done a great deal of work with the > inks and shared the information freely. I do not understand your > antagonism. I think some air needs to be cleared here. I hope I'm not being too presumptuous or provocative, but here goes. I get the feeling JB is not the only person on this list who think Paul is affiliated with MIS, and is thus an opponent, competitor, or in some way has an axe to grind with Cone's Piezo. I think people presumptuous that because he writes curves for the MIS inks, and in fact, contributes to their inkset formulations, so it's not a far fetched notion. Paul, lets say I accuse you of (which I don't BTW), for whatever reason, being biased against Piezo, and perhaps engaging in misinformation or biased information toward their products. Would you care to state for yourself what your "position" is relative to either or both of those manufacturers? Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test - German Etching & Piezo, MIS VM & X3 on EAM
2001-10-17 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.