I've seen it described as smooth too, very misleading. It's probably the coarsest tooth I've seen on a coated inkjet paper. It's not whitened like PhotoRag so not as bright, but not nearly as warm as German Etching. Given all that, it's my favorite paper. Dmax like PhotoRag, without the card-like smooth surface and screaming white, it has a character that adds in a way I like. Looks beautiful with Steve's Xray floral images, particularly large, and I like it for straight large format landscapes. The surface does not take away from fine detail. If only that tooth were knocked down a bit, more like Somerset, it just might be perfect. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@c...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've read descriptions of William Turner on a few vendor sites and some mention WT is > smooth and some say it rough...it gets confusing! I even downloaded the PDFs from Hmule > and it's not clear. > > Can anyone with first hand knowledge describe how WT compares to PhotoRag and likes > and dislikes? > > I'm using QTR with an Epson 890 UT2 inks. > > Many Thanks, > > John V.
Message
Re: How does William Turner compare to PhotoRag?
2004-05-09 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.