Don, Thanks for you insightful comments. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Don M <don@m...> wrote: > randy_rancier2004 wrote: > > > > > >Also, if you know, please explain the difference between Picture > >Window and Picture Window Pro; they don't explain on their website. > > > > From what I have read and have heard from some is that it sounds > >like a good program that can be a lot simplier than the full blown > >version of PhotoShop, but with a lot of control that you lose in > >Photoshop Elements. > > I'm only partly qualified per your (quite reasonable) standards. > :) > > I am not skilled at PS, but I have it. I have PW Pro. From my limited > experience with PS, PWP seems to be more direct than PS in terms of what it > takes to accomplish a given task. Presumably that's because it is > specifically geared to photo editing, and is not an all-around graphics > program like PS. > > PWP does not use layers. I forget the philosophy behind that. Basically, > each change you make is on a separate working file, so you are always > working on a new "layer". Although, I know enough PS to know that layers > bring more to the table than just that. > > The Pro version includes color management. It also works with 16 bit BW, > 48 bit color. Maybe the plain version does too, I'm not sure on that one. > > Basically, it is what you surmised. > Take a look at Norman Koren's website: www.normankoren.com He goes into a > lot of detail on PWP. > > Also, if you post on the PWP support forum, ask any questions you > want. The author of the program is not afraid of saying what PWP can or > cannot do and why or why not. > > -Don M
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Picture Windows opinion
2004-05-16 by Randy Rancier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.