--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, J Vee <j.vee@g...> wrote: > I don¹t know if anyone is interested, but I still also print traditional > Carbon, where one makes your own ³tissue² (watercolor pigment mixture in > gelatin suspension) for printing. I can say categorically that matamerism > is certainly present. J vee What is "traditional" carbon? Various kinds of carbon black (channel black, charcoal black, bone black, etc) have been in use for centuries,if not millenia. The pigments used in the black inks in my collection of stone-plate lithographs make between 1895 and 1915 (I think 100 years old qualifies as "traditional") are still perfectly black and exhibit no metamerism. Also note that many watercolor blacks are NOT carbon black - they are often aniline black. You can't go by the name on the tube of paint - for instance, many "cadmium red"s don't actually contain cadmium anymore. Can anyone cite any authoritative sources for what the black ink (either OEM or 3rd party) is ACTUALLY using for a pigment? The Epson UC Matte Black seems awfully warm for a "traditional" carbon black, whatever that is.
Message
[Digital BW] Re:Darkroom vs. Inkjet
2004-05-17 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.