I wrote to colorbyte last week and requested they consider a B&W only version. No response (yet). There's really no concrete way of knowing how many people would be interested in a B&W-only version. But, as Epson's canned color profiles get better and better (witness the R800 and the 4000), the other primary benefit of IP for me -- the library of color profiles -- begins to wane in importance. (In fact, I was never really blown away by the difference between IP's color profiles and Epson's on the 2200 -- there was a difference, but not nearly as significant as for B&W.). Given that, the price of IP is a LOT to pay for IP's B&W ability. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tom Baker <tbaker1328@s...> wrote: > > "... My bet is that they certainly do not see the > mainstay of their business as the small B&W market segment...." > > That's certainly true. As far as I know they don't make a b&w only product. A b&w IP version probably wouldn't make any business sense. However, It would be interesting to find out how much people would 'willingly' pay for a stripped down, b&w only version. > > > > Tom Baker > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] When BW printing will stop being Amateur Hour?
2004-05-17 by chipcarterdc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.