Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Negatives

2004-05-30 by Chris Hargens

Thanks, Charlie, for all the information. I agree with all the points 
you've made as well as the theory behind them. As for the prints I've 
been making with various quadtone sets on matte paper so far, I'm 
reasonably happy with some and unhappy with others. I like the look 
of the Ultrachromes when printing BW, but I don't like the problem 
with metamerism (as well as the slight bronzing when printing on 
glossy papers). 

Chris Hargens

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Charlie Dennis" 
<scprints@b...> wrote:
> Chris,
> 
> Just a few things you should consider when making your negs for 
prints in
> the way that you want, on your printer.
> 
> Sorry these are so long.
> 
> 1. any problems that you have making ink prints on your printer 
will also
> hold true for making a neg off the same device. It will be no 
better than
> the prints you make. Anything that can and does happen to your 
prints will
> happen to the negative plus the time you will spend in the darkroom 
finding
> out if the negative is any good.
> 
> 2. Making a negative in a printer is an additive process to a 
substrate. It
> is not an exposure process to a coated material and then applying a
> subtractive process that is both chemical and physical.
> 
> 3. The image on the negative produced by the image setter is 
controlled by a
> high end laser that is calibrated and tested every day for accuracy 
and
> consistency
> 
> 4. The dots or random spot of the image setter can be much finer in 
its
> resolution than anything that a printer will be capable of 
producing. The
> spot it produces can be the equivalent of a 600 line per inch 
screen value.
> That is a spot smaller than the size of the silver crystals in the 
film you
> use in your camera.
> 
> 5. Control and consistency on the negative is a standard operating 
procedure
> of the process when the image bureau creates a film that is 
readable with a
> target chart and densiotometer.
> 
> 6. There will be no blocking of values at either end of the scale 
of the
> image setter neg. It will have more information than your printing 
paper
> will be able to record.
> 
> 7. You will be less at the mercy of inconsistent neg. because of 
density
> problems and clogged heads of a print device with an image setter.
> 
> 8. If you inkjet prints are lacking in the snap that you want, then 
the
> negative you create on it will more than likely lack something 
also. The
> fact that you are printing to a silver print paper will not solve 
all that
> you are looking for in the print. If the print is flat the negative 
will
> also be flat produced in the same way.
> 
> I for one have never been a fan of any additive process. It has 
never proven
> to be as consistent and accurate as a subtractive system in 
reproduction. In
> the graphic arts industry, system after system of additive 
processes has
> been dropped or revised always in favor of the easier to control 
subtractive
> and exposure systems.
> 
> I am not saying the negative from a printer will not work or will 
not be
> usable, but it will depend on the investment of your time and 
testing you
> put into it. The shorter way will be the image setter if you are a
> perfectionist for technical detail.
> 
> I would be pleased to see how your efforts turn out. If you have a
> densitometer to read both reflective and transmission values of the 
print
> and negatives you will make your life a lot easier when making 
adjustments
> to your finished work.
>   Charlie Dennis
>    -----Original Message-----
>   From: Chris Hargens [mailto:chargens@s...]
>   Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:06 AM
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Negatives
> 
> 
>   Thanks, Randy and Charles, for your advice. If I go the digital
>   negative route, I'll be using my 2200 to make them. According to
>   Burkholder the 2200, along with the 7600/9600, "gives the best 
negs
>   on the desktop yet." I've read that for silver printing, as 
opposed
>   to platinum, imagesetter negatives are superior to those from 
inkjet
>   printers, but I haven't heard anything to suggest that inkjet
>   negatives noticeably lower in quality.
> 
>   Chris Hargens
> 
> 
> 
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
>   If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> page.
> 
>   Please follow these basic guidelines:
>   - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> them short.
>   - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
>   - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from
> the membership.
>   - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
Owner and
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files 
section:
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
>   BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
THE  "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED 
OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE 
INABILITY
> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED 
ACCESS TO OR
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
CONDUCT OF ANY
> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY 
OTHER
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> 
> 
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> --
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
> 
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.