--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" <daniel@p...> wrote: > > The compression probably messes up some of the transitions > > but I think the main thing you are seeing with the vertical > > lines is just the individual 256 steps of gray. Photoshop > > will create two kinds of gradients -- 256 hard edged steps > > and smooth dithered gradients. The "dither" option in the > > Gradient tool there a check box for the two kinds. > > I think there are more problems than just the individual steps > showing... Here I've increased the contrast on the stepwedge to make the > problem more visible, then enlarged it quite a bit: > http://daniel.staver.no/img/compressedstepwedge.jpg > > > It's real easy to fix up the 21step. Just select the top > > half and make a new gradient with dither on. Select the > > bottom half, make a gradient with the dither off, and > > posterize to 21 levels. > > I made a new cleaned-up version without artifacts and updated the > technical.psd file with the new stepwedge. I also made a smaller version > of for test prints. All three files are available here: > > http://download.petraflux.com/technical.zip (3.59mb) > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no Much nicer, Daniel. One thing I noticed however is that two of the files, the smaller wedge and technical, are Adobe RGB rather than Grayscale. This introduces some profile conversion differences especially in the 95% step -- it comes out 96% with a dither. Roy
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Uncompressed version of Paul Roark's stepwedge?
2004-05-31 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.