> Much nicer, Daniel. One thing I noticed however is that two > of the files, the smaller wedge and technical, are Adobe RGB > rather than Grayscale. This introduces some profile > conversion differences especially in the 95% step -- it comes > out 96% with a dither. Thanks for letting me know! I've updated the zip file with new grayscale images where the problem is fixed. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Uncompressed version of Paul Roark's stepwedge?
2004-05-31 by Daniel Staver