Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

C84

2004-06-09 by Paul Roark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ara 
<rovision@y...> wrote:
>> ... But, this implies that the
>> quality of photo prints would be equal to those obtained using a
>> higher end, photo dedicated Epson printers?
> 

Matthew wrote:

>For monochrome, quad printing (I believe limited to 8"x10"), yes I 
>would think the C84 would be equal to the higher-end Epson photo 
>printers, such as the 1280 or 2200.

...

The hextone printers have somewhat less dense dots than the C82 or C84.
That is, the hextone printers are very slightly smoother in the highlights.


The C82 & C84 have smoothness that is essentially the same as the high-end
UltraChrome printers (2200, 7600 and 9600) using the Image Print RIP,
according to my tests.  Not bad for a $70 (plus or minus whatever) printer.
No printer can make a more archival print than the C82 or C84 using the MIS
EZ inks and a good cotton paper, like Epson PremierArt matte Scrapbook
paper.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.