My monitor is calibrated (really just set) to GG 2.2, the windows default. I get WYSIWYG with UT2 straight out of the box. For BO, I have to set the printer profile as 10% DG. That's with an LCD. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Johnny Eades" <jeades1@s...> wrote: > Back again folks, > > I know you are getting tired of me asking the same question, but I > haven't gotten any answers to it yet. WHAT IS YOUR MONITOR > CALIBRATED OR SET TO--GG 1.8 OR GG 2.2? > > Still your friend in Photography, > > Johnny Eades > > PS I'll keep asking till someone answers my simple question. > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > But John I think perhaps you are missing the point. Pick a gamma > setting, > > say 2.2. Calibrate your profile with this gamma setting. Select > a PS > > workspace, say Gray Gamme 2.2 and away you go. The issue only > appears when > > you want to soft proof. In a colour environment you would set up > a soft > > proof via View/Proof Setup and use the colour profile of the > printer/media > > combination you are using. Since B&W printing mostly uses a Same > as Source > > method of printing rather than the selection of the printer/media > ICC > > profile and colorsyncing the workflow, accurate soft proofing has > alluded > > B&W printing for some time. It was Tyler Boley I believe who > devised a > > proofing system using a custom dot gain to preview the image. Carl > > Schofield came upon an ICC based approach that I highlighted to > you earlier. > > With an accurate method of soft proofing such as the system used > by Carl the > > selection of gamma is irrelevant. > > > > > > From: "Johnny Eades" <jeades1@s...> > > > > I received several replies to the question as to what many of you > > are using your monitor set to---GG 1.8 or GG 2.2; and I may need to > > clarify my question as first asked. What do many of you have your > > monitor gamma set to? > > > > I understand all the replies that referred to the color management > > issues and effect of Gamma on display characteristics. I don't have > > a problem with Gamma myself, I was just asking what many of you > have > > your monitor set to. I realize the glossy paper has a higher D-max > > and is therefore going to print the lower tones darker than Matte > > paper is ,and I make adjustments to the proof to get the > > satisfactory resulting print on glossy. If the shadows are to low, > I > > raise them to gain printable details relative to the visualized > > image.Proofing is simply previewing how the finished print should > > look. My criteria is enough body in the shadows to support the > > impression there is something visible there. > > > > Your friend in Photography, > > > > Johnny Eades > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Calibrated monitor at GG 1.8 and proof at GG 2.2 on glossy pape
2004-06-15 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.