2.2, but it doesn't make any difference. Tom Baker Johnny Eades <jeades1@...> wrote: Back again folks, I know you are getting tired of me asking the same question, but I haven't gotten any answers to it yet. WHAT IS YOUR MONITOR CALIBRATED OR SET TO--GG 1.8 OR GG 2.2? Still your friend in Photography, Johnny Eades PS I'll keep asking till someone answers my simple question. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale wrote: > But John I think perhaps you are missing the point. Pick a gamma setting, > say 2.2. Calibrate your profile with this gamma setting. Select a PS > workspace, say Gray Gamme 2.2 and away you go. The issue only appears when > you want to soft proof. In a colour environment you would set up a soft > proof via View/Proof Setup and use the colour profile of the printer/media > combination you are using. Since B&W printing mostly uses a Same as Source > method of printing rather than the selection of the printer/media ICC > profile and colorsyncing the workflow, accurate soft proofing has alluded > B&W printing for some time. It was Tyler Boley I believe who devised a > proofing system using a custom dot gain to preview the image. Carl > Schofield came upon an ICC based approach that I highlighted to you earlier. > With an accurate method of soft proofing such as the system used by Carl the > selection of gamma is irrelevant. > > > From: "Johnny Eades" > > I received several replies to the question as to what many of you > are using your monitor set to---GG 1.8 or GG 2.2; and I may need to > clarify my question as first asked. What do many of you have your > monitor gamma set to? > > I understand all the replies that referred to the color management > issues and effect of Gamma on display characteristics. I don't have > a problem with Gamma myself, I was just asking what many of you have > your monitor set to. I realize the glossy paper has a higher D-max > and is therefore going to print the lower tones darker than Matte > paper is ,and I make adjustments to the proof to get the > satisfactory resulting print on glossy. If the shadows are to low, I > raise them to gain printable details relative to the visualized > image.Proofing is simply previewing how the finished print should > look. My criteria is enough body in the shadows to support the > impression there is something visible there. > > Your friend in Photography, > > Johnny Eades > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Calibrated monitor at GG 1.8 and proof at GG 2.2 on glossy paper
2004-06-16 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.