Jack, I was the original poster -- two quick replies. First, I processed the film myself -- I didn't send it out to a lab. Second, I prefer the way the film develops a bit unevenly at short times (and yes, four minutes for Rodinal is very short) -- what you consider a flaw, I consider a virtue. In fact, everything about how I shot that image is "flawed," right down to using a 1910 Kodak Model 3A with 120 roll film in place of the original 122 film (giving a 6x14 negative) and hand-holding a stack of Hasselblad neutral-density filters in front of the lens during the exposure. It's not a perfect negative -- it wasn't meant to be. Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net In a message dated 6/29/04 8:15:56 AM, Jack writes: > > http://www.pbase.com/image/28736293 > This a good example of why you should avoid short developement times- > the uneven edges as seen in this shot are certain to occur. > Most commercial labs have never been good at black and white > negative development-color is much easier to control and maintain > chemistry- > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: OT - controlling tech pan contrast
2004-06-29 by sandersm@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.