Jules, >... > How do we end up? >Mixing toxic chemicals that stink to high heaven. >... and where can I get some glycerol? It's readily available. Even Photographer's Formulary has it. See http://www.photoformulary.com/DesktopModules/StoreSearchResult.aspx?Search=g lycerol&tabindex=2&tabid=9&mid=37&langId=0 And don't worry, it doesn't smell bad. Paul www.PaulRoark.com ________________ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Ernst, > > If you look at the material safety data sheets, the UC inks often have > mostly water and glycerol in them. Some have glycols and probably all have > "proprietary organic materials" in addition to the "proprietary dyes and > pigments." My goal was to make a bare-bones supplemental base that would at > least not be incompatible with the existing Epson base (which they will not > provide to us hackers). > > The main things that are missing in the simple glycerol water base appear to > be wetting agents and binders. With the Epson pigs, however, the acrylic > coating is the main binder, so that is not missing. (That would not be the > case with an Eboni diluting, for example.) For a cleaning fluid, a binder > is also not helpful. > > I experimented with wetting agents and even some de-foamers that are said to > be better than glycol (like isopropyl alcohol), and I could not tell that > there was any difference in the Epson ink dilutions (except the alcohol in > some of the mixes smelled bad). I used to prefer Kodak Photo Flo -- a > glycol & alcohol mix similar to what is often used in the inksets -- and it > looks like whatever Epson is using also works just fine at half the strength > they use. > > From my perspective, the benefit of not putting anything more in the mix is > that the risk of incompatibility is virtually eliminated. All I'm adding is > a chemical that is already a major part of the mix. > > If you are interested in a cleaning solution, a bit of Photo Flo (try 0.2%) > could be added to give the base the wetting agent characteristics. > > I'll be curious how the fade test of my UC-based mixes looks. If one is > close to competitive, I'll refine it and publish the formula. That way > there will be an Epson-based inkset out there that would always be available > to everyone. Some who think that third party pigs are somehow inferior > might prefer an Epson-based formula. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > ______________________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ernst Dinkla [mailto:E.Dinkla@c...] > Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 1:08 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Blackless printing > > Paul Roark wrote: > > > I'm not sure that is the case. The Eboni is the one that is much more > > neutral than the MIS version. I have a test inkset made with UC inks and > > that inkset's "warm-carbon" curve seems to be more neutral than the MIS > > version. (Perhaps it's my new base -- real complex: distilled water and > > glycerol.) > > Paul, > > Is that all, distilled water and glycerol ? I have a 10000CF > now and it will be converted to MIS 7600 but I think a cleaning > has to be done in between. If that base would do the trick then > I'm less worried. > > John Nollendorfs mentioned glycerol as a component of the Ilford > Archiva inks ages ago. It has the thixotropy and the retarder > qualities to keep pigments suspended and nozzles open. > > > Ernst Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Simple base (was Blackless printing)
2004-07-04 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.