Ernst, The Epson Archival black in the CF (called "Archival" in the U.S.) inkset is clearly the one that should be replaced first. My fade testing suggests it is not a 100% pigment ink. It tests out almost exactly like the old PiezoBW and MIS FS & VM black inks. Eboni and Epson UC Matte black appear to be much more lightfast. In my current fade test I have not only a UC-based B&W inkset, but also one that uses the UC Photo and Light black pigs with the Epson Archival color pigs to cool them down. It should be interesting to see which one does better. Paul www.PaulRoark.com __________________ -----Original Message----- From: Ernst Dinkla [mailto:E.Dinkla@chello.nl] Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 12:29 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Simple bases (was Blackless printing) Paul Roark wrote: > Ernst, > > I forgot to mention the glycerol mixing ratio to get the viscosity right: > it's 4 parts water to 3 parts glycerol. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Paul, thank you. I will try it first on the Epson 10000CF black > Eboni. With good profiling I can use the rest of the Epson Archival inks till they have to be replaced. So far with ink changes on 9000's and 9600's the Eboni was the most problematic to get running but the density it delivers must be better than the Archival black does. BTW, I tested a silkscreen varnish that a befriended manufacturer delivered. Explained the qualities of the Hydrocote. He got me a UV curing aliphatic polyurethane. As I understand it this isn't new but an existing formula. It is water clear on gloss papers and hardly visible on matte papers. Good gloss. I'm not so sure whether it adheres well on gloss papers (PPGP). Deepens the colors on matte but it is difficult to harden the coat then as it penetrates too much. The smell then stays which isn't a nice one.. The advantages are the longer time one can use for applying (in case of one or few prints I use a foam roller), there's no solvent in it so the layer applied stays as thick, probably no water in it either but I saw some dissolving effects on dye inks. The crosslinking of the urethane should be better than with dispersions, so a true skin. Needs a UV curer. So a mixed bag. Ernst Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Simple bases (was Blackless printing)
2004-07-04 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.