Antonis, Thanks for the update. Can I assume from your comments that the "QuadBlack Toneable" inkset Lyson is currently selling for the 2100/2200 is only for use with the Epson driver and that they do not yet have a final inkset that will be marketed with IJC/OPM? The neutrals + CMY for toning make sense if the tones can be controlled well enough to yield uniform tonality across the gray scale. Alternatively, a couple of pre-mixed quad inksets might be easier to handle and blend. Carl On Monday, July 5, 2004, at 02:20 PM, Antonis wrote: > Carl, > > I have been using some of the same Lyson inks in a 7000 for some time. > I tried blending the neutral and the warm (but not the cool) > on various Lyson papers, including the Darkroom Gloss. > That paper is absolutely stunning in its ability to hold a good > black. Its surface is also by far the closest to a real darkroom > air-dried fiber paper I have ever seen in digital bw. > > Metamerism remains an issue, but with a careful blend you can get a > decent > print that shifts within an acceptable range. I have shown the results > to many people to get a sense of their response. Some rejected it > outright, some > had no problem with it under daylight. You can blend for a given light > source > to get decent results, but you can't have one blend for all lights. > > I looked at the spectral distribution and there was a significant > spike at the red end > and another bump at the blue/purple end with a dip in the yellow/green > area. > This accounts for these effects, but this inkset offers no way to > smooth out > the bumps when you only blend warm and neutral. > > It may be that the solution (currently considered) is to use CMY inks > from the > Lysonic set and the grays from the neutral quads to achieve a better > color. > To this end Lyson will also be selling their own version of IJC/OPM > with > related profiles. See the Bowhaus release today: > http://www.bowhaus.com/inkjetcontrol/ > > The Darkroom Gloss paper is such an amazing paper that I think it's > worth > ironing out these problems. And, frankly, those who like black-only > prints > may have a field day with this paper. It won't take Ultrachromes, so > it will > have to be one of the Lyson blacks. But the black can get to be so > heavy that I had to dial back the dmax when I was profiling it with > IJC. > It would exceed 3.0... and I had to cut it down to 2.4 - 2.7. I > don't know > anything else in the market that will do that. > The 4000 with the much finer dither may be just the ticket for this. > > Keep in mind that prints made on that paper are not water-resistant, > but on the plus side, the paper coating is of the swellable polymer > kind > that protects the dyes better. I have no longevity data on this yet. > Lyson > dyes have had a solid reputation for stability and were the ones used > in the original Iris bw prints (aka giclee). Don't know how they fare > next > to the current champs (PT, UC, UT). > > > Antonis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Lyson QuadBlack Toneable for 2100/2200
2004-07-05 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.