Hi, I can certainly understand why someone would want to go to third party inks if they are using a Windows system and didn't want to shell out big bucks for Image Print. But I would like to know why anyone with a MAC and 2200 would prefer a third party ink solution to either OPM or QTR. I am using a MAC/2200 with UC inks and QTR and I love the results. Is there a better solution that gives better print quality, longevity, lower costs, etc that I don't know about? If so, which system? Thanks, Dave Gordon DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > What's the problem with options? You see people on lists seeking help > with problems, there are others with few to none using 3rd party inks > that have no time for lists, and Epsons are hardly free of problems > either. Some people, including myself, also prefer the results they > get from other processes to the B&W solution from Imageprint, and also > may prefer the companies they deal with to Colorbyte. > It sounds like you have your solution and are happy with it, and are > convinced it's the only way, so I'm not sure what kind of answer you > are looking for. > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "digikdm" > <monroekd@h...> wrote: > > Would someone explain to be why there is so much banter/trial and > > error/ and switching of vendors with regards to third party ink > > systems when all you really need is a good RIP using Epson inks. I > > know someone will counter that one of the colored Epson UC inks( > > yellow is the usual culprit mentioned) will > > fade over time producing metamerism, but there is little to no proof > > of the latter using the newer Epson UC inks. The prints I've seen > > using Imageprint as a RIP are as good as any I've seen( other than > > fiber-based halide)using any other ink systems. Why burden yourself > > with ink clogs and ever-changing curves, etc. It's a technology bog. > > I've found the upfront costs of Imageprint( admittedly a RIP-off, pun > > intended) to be worth the cost in the long run. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tigertwous" > > <jfisher@s...> wrote: > > > I've just ordered my set of Piezography inks from IJM for my Epson > > 7600 inked > > > with matt black UC inks, I'm running Studio Print 10 from a > > Windows XP Pro system > > > and will have access to a X-rite DTP41. I plan on using Epson > > Enhanced Matte to learn > > > on but will move up to some other types as I get my feet wet. Any > > suggestions as to > > > what I should do first (other than the obvious) I usually just play > > around and find my > > > way in the dark and eventually come up with what I need, but I > > thought if I ask you > > > folks I may be able to shorten the time it takes to achieve some > > successful results. > > > > > > Thanks I'm looking forward to making some spectacular prints in > > the future. > > > > > > Jack Fisher > > > St. Louis, MO
Message
Re: Why bother with third party inks?
2004-07-14 by dave08g
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.