Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: B&W on the 4000 - Epson driver

2004-07-21 by Andrew Unger

My main point is that using Printer Color Management - Color 
Controls and Photorealistic is better than Epson's ICC profiles for 
doing B&W and Scott apparently agrees.  This morning I made my test 
print with +1Y and -1M and after it dried I compared it with my 
first print which was without slider adjustment.  I looked at them 
in morning northlight, tungsten-halogen, fluorescent and in 
mixtures.  The differences were subtle, yet important to me.  The 
goal is to reduce metamerism and not have objectionable tones in any 
of these lighting situations.  I don't think you can completely 
overcome it.  Even Imageprint has to use multiple profiles for each 
paper depending on predominant lighting.  What I noticed was that 
the slider adjustments reduced the Magenta bias that was present in 
the no-slider version in fluorescent particularly and also in the 
others.  It seemed more neutral in all lighting situations.  I want 
to produce a print that will look good in the gallery which has 
daylight and fluorescent and will eventually be shown under 
tungsten. 

Andrew


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Graham" 
<gebilwil@n...> wrote:
> Gosh, i don't have any trouble getting neutral B&W from the UC 
inks and std driver.  I use 
> "printer color management" (as you do) and sliders at zero.  It 
comes out neutral.
> 
> Of course I don't use a gray scale image, but RGB.  Grayscale only 
has to be converted to 
> RGB by the printer anyway, and the more conversions the sadder 
(round off, clipping, etc)
> 
> I do have to make sure that my RGB "grayscale" is desaturated 
though.  Made a mess at 
> first cuz I was scanning B&W negs in RGB and the scanner was not 
perfectly neutral.
> 
> Scott
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew 
Unger" <ungram@y...> 
> wrote:
> > I doubt that I'll be able to get the Gray Balancer for the 4000 
and 
> > maybe that's for the best.  It appears that a solution to a 
neutral 
> > and I think, reasonably metamarism free print is pretty simple.  
> > 
> > Create a grayscale image, include a ramp.  In Print use "same as 
> > source" for the Printspace.  Select Custom and in Advanced use 
Color 
> > controls and Photo-realistic.  Make a print.  Then follow the 
Tyler 
> > Boley method of Grayscale softproofing which I think is still 
> > available in files.  Make a curve to match what you now see in 
the proofing 
> > view.  In my case with EEM it was necessary to open shadows with 
> > particular emphasis in the 95-100 range.  Make another print.  
Once 
> > you are satisfied with the ramp and the overall image, save the 
> > setup.  Then work on getting to neutral.  I found that very 
small 
> > increments of the sliders give what is needed.  My version of 
> > neutral was a -2Y adjustment.  Save the settings with each 
iteration 
> > under the same name.  It may get to be clumsy to set up say 4 
tones 
> > for each of many papers.  
> > 
> > Epson's advice in the manuals and the Holbert video about B&W 
> > printing didn't help me at all.  I was going crazy with very 
> > pronounced color casts trying to print with their profiles.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.