On 29/7/04 6:14 pm, "Glenn Jobson" <peepingheads@...> wrote: > Hello, been reading the group, my first post though..... > > I have been using the Permajet VT Blax ink set with my Epson 1290s on my Mac, > running > OSX 10.3 and the latest Epson driver. > > Following the Permajet instructions the results are horrible, really muddy. I > have tried a > variety of Permajet papers, it's not the paper. > > I know that the Epson driver has some issues, I can cope with those using my > GretagMacbeth Eye-One to create custom ICC profiles for colour. > > Also tried the CUPS driver, my prefered driver for colour images on my Epson > 1200 and > 670 but the VT Blax ink printed from the CUPS driver is just as bad as the > Epson. > > If I use the same images on MacOS 9.2.2, printed from Photoshop 7.0 via the > OS9 Epson > driver for the 1290s the results are better but I suspect not as good as they > should be. > > On a PC, WindowsXP and PS7, Epson driver, the images are good, seems that the > PC driver > is better 'tuned' than the Mac driver(s). > > My questions for you knowledgable lot are as follows... > > 1. Is the Permajet VT Blax a rebadged inkset from elsewhere..? > > 2. Does anyone else use this ink set with OSX Epson or CUPS drivers with any > success..? > > 3. Would QTR be of any use with this ink set....? > > Loads of questions, but I know this is the place to look for answers...:-) > > Thanks in advance... > > Glenn @ colourmad.co.uk I've tried the Permajet VT Blax cartridges in my 1160 and was not satisfied with the results. This was following precisely Permajets instructions, using a G4 running OSX 10.3.4. I've gone back and tried to produce good prints a few times, no success. I'm glad I didn't jump straight in and invest in the CIS. I'm about to flush out the ink and switch to Lyson small gamut. I thought the prints I saw produced at Focus on Imaging were good, but I've never been able to achieve the same. Steve Bell
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Permajet VT Blax and MacOS X
2004-07-30 by Steve Bell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.