Hi Rob, I've tested Moab Entrada BW and Natural on my Epson 2200 with UC inks against EEM, Epson Velvet Fine Art, Epson Ultrasmooth, PR, and Premier Art Hot Press. For me, personally, the Bright White print characteristics were not to my liking, however, I quickly became entralled with the Natural selection. For B&W, it prints ever so slightly warmer than Epson Velvet, but slightly cooler than Ultrasmooth. Placing the same image printed on Velvet, Ultrasmooth, and Entrada Natural side-by-side in many light condidtions, the EN print just seems to "glow" a little more than the others. Paper color and surface characteristics are very similar to Ultrasmooth. A very nice paper, indeed. Order a sample pack and test for yourself. Alan Huntley P.S. I should mention that I print through IP 5.6. > > From: Robert Krawiec <robk64@...> > Date: 2004/07/30 Fri PM 02:15:11 EDT > To: digitalblackandwhitetheprint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Moab Entrada > > Hi, > > Does anyone have experience with Moab Entrada papers > with either 2200 or UT2 inks? Good? Bad? > > Thanks, > > Rob > > PS I bought the UT2 inks based on the information > given on this list and I'm delighted with them. Thanks > too to Paul Roark for his curves!
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Moab Entrada
2004-07-30 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.