I believe another difference between the two systems is that with the MIS system, the ink lines connect directly to the cart. With NMC system, the tubes are fed through a small construction designed, I assume to hold the tubes in place on the carts without stressing the joint to the 'elbow' that feeds the ink into the carts. It's not a big deal, but another point where I feel the NMC system just seems a bit more 'pro' than 'am'. Nij > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Wolfson [mailto:rwolfson@...] > Sent: 25 October 2001 13:52 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Recommendation for CIS > > > I have a NoMoreCarts CIS on one Epson 1200 printer, and a recent MIS > system on another. They are not the same. > > The new MIS system provides two filling methods; I used the vacuum fill > option and it worked flawlessly. A plus. > > But the feed arrangement with the MIS system did allow the ribbon tubing > to contact the surface below the print head (where all the little paper > rollers are) briefly, and in my case, at least, this was not harmless. > Sometimes the print head would collide with the ribbon tubing, sending > the printer into violent convulsions and spoiling the print. I solved > the problem by modifying the acrylic plastic bracket that supports the > tubing near the center of the printer to hold the tubing higher. The > NoMoreCarts system uses a bracket of rather different design, which also > holds the ribbon tubing higher. I sent email about this problem to MIS, > but got no answer. > > Other than that, both systems have been fine. > > Richard Wolfson > rwolfson at LyricDesign.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Recommendation for CIS
2001-10-25 by Nij
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.