Unfortunately, this is a thread that shows its ugly head every couple months. Generally, we get the same answers, and a quite a few are misleading historically. The title of "pigment print" is is a misnomer because it is already used to describe a completely different and historic process. A "Carbon Print" is a very labor intensive and beautiful process that very few people practice currently. Clayton's use of "Carbon ink print" is very accurate, as it does not use the same name for a completely different process. While our carbon ink prints have stunning longevity, I doubt that they will achieve the same lifespan as that of a true carbon print. The best solution I have used is simply "Piezograph" (piezo being the technology we utilize in inkjet printing). I have previously used this description for both color and monochrome works, as it does not mislead or confuse by using the same terminology as historic processes. However, it does distinguish our process from conventional silver and alternative process printing. For a more specific description, I now utilize "Carbon Piezograph" and "Pigment Piezograph" to distinguish between color and monochrome works as well as the nature/composition of the print as well as its longevity. Any thoughts/takers? Don Hill __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Message
RE: [Digital BW] what to call these prints - try this out...
2004-08-03 by D. Hill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.