Hello Don,
>Clayton's use of "Carbon ink print" is very accurate,
>as it does not use the same name for a completely
>different process.
>The best solution I have used is simply "Piezograph"
>(piezo being the technology we utilize in inkjet
>printing)..."Carbon Piezograph"
> Any thoughts/takers?
You make some good points. One of the things I'm sensitive to in a
name is the aesthetic part of it, and Piezograph seems too mechanical
or technical or something and carries no inherent meaning to someone
who knows nothing about it. Plus it's hard for a lay person to
pronounce. I have trouble visualizing that term in upscale gallery
with refined clientele ("We sell only the finest Silver, Piezograph
and Platinum prints"). Somehow it doesn't quite fit.
I finally settled on Carbon Ink Print because it's accurate, doesn't
encroach on a previous name, is easy to pronounce and remember, and
has an elegance and distinction that fits better with Silver and
Platinum (plus the historical references I mentioned in the article -
I don't know if that's important to anyone else, I'm a romantic I
guess - but I think it helps). I also believe we should capitalize on
the fact that it's an ink-based process, something people don't talk
about very much.
Regards,
Clayton
Info on black and white digital printing at
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htmMessage
Re: [Digital BW] what to call these prints - try this out...
2004-08-03 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.