At 11:04 AM -0700 8/16/04, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: >[snip] >... two monitors can also be a plus. However, be aware that Windows >can't do independent color management on two different monitors, But a Mac can? >so if you go that route, either reserve one monitor for displaying >pictures, or get two identical monitors. >[snip] Are identical monitors _that_ identical? I wouldn't have thought so. And in any case, couldn't the palette display be enough smaller than the image display to make identical displays appreciably more expensive? My impression is that a palette display needn't be larger than a notebook's screen, and that someone who needs a notebook anyway might get a very economical - of space as well as money - workstation by using a desktop-replacement notebook together with a second, usually larger and probably better, display for images. But I agree that it would be nice to see the same colors on the notebook's screen as on the image display, especially if the notebook is a traveling companion for a digital camera. -- Sam, who thinks that, for a photographer, system design should _start_ with the displays
Message
dual-display color management (was RE: [Digital BW] Ideal Windows computer spec)
2004-08-16 by Sam McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.