I'd agree with your rhetorical question - that an act of creation does not become a work of art until it is received by another. It doesn't mean that it isn't a creative work, could be excellent, but excellence in a work of art lies in the perception as such by an outside audience. Tim > So a person who "creates" work purely for their own enjoyment, for the > love of the act rather than the result, is not an artist, and their > creations are not art until they are seen? > > I realize this is analogous to whether a tree makes as sound when it > falls....and the sound of one hand clapping....But art is a Zen thing. > It is a function of the mindset of the artist in the moment(s) of > creation. > > Art isn't in the object that we see, it's in the process that creates > it. The power it may or may not have over us is in our interpretation > of it, but art lives in creation. No viewer is required. > -- Tim Spragens http://www.borderless-photos.com & http://www.borderless-photos.de
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: ART and LIFE
2001-10-26 by Tim Spragens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.