Well, if they were made using a pigmented ink printer, such as one that uses ultrachrome or piezography, they could be called Pigment Prints. That term seems to be pretty accepted. The Museum of Photographic Arts here in San Diego has an exhibition right now by Robert Weingarten and all of the prints are labled as pigment prints. They were printed using a 9600 on one of the textured papers, not sure which right now though. It doesn't have the "stigma" of digital print or the history of giclee. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ross Borgida <borgida@y...> wrote: > I like the name carbon ink print. however, I showed an image at a gallery and the gallery owner preferred giclee. > > "B. Campbell" <bellis60@v...> wrote:I'm bringing some digital prints to a gallery tomorrow for an exhibit > opening next month. Unless the gallery owner has other ideas I plan to call > them "carbon ink" prints. Nobody will know what that means but unless > someone wants to buy it won't matter and if they do the gallery owner can > explain. I'll call them "digital ink jet prints" before I'll call them > "giclee." > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Perry McNeal" <pjmcneal@m...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] what to call these prints. > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has the group come to any kind of consensus on a name? I will be showing > > my first non-darkroom produced B&W images in October. I hope to call > > them something other than digital images. > > If not, what names are at the top of the list now? Help! > > > > Perry > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] what to call these prints.
2004-08-20 by Josh Freeman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.